Activities
The Hope of "appointing Hillary Clinton as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court"
Olympic and Intellectual Property
A Mystery about "Authors" of Classical Music
Holi Colour
©½§kε«ηδέlααα
One Friday in a Patent Attorney's Life
Things at Law School in America (3)
Harry Potter and the DDS Hallows
If You Look For a Wide Range of Human Resources
Software Copyright Registration System in China
Shane! Come Back! The case of "Shane"-
An "Intellectual Property-based Nation" and International Harmonization of Intellectual Property
If you listen
Industrial Property Digital Library
Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and Intellectual Property Right
Flying over Siberia
FAIR use of works of art
A New Strategic Move for IPR Protection in China
Could private companies be the savior of technical innovation in China?
A Sequel to the Used Game Lawsuit
Convergence of Telecommunication and Broadcasting
Things at Law School in America (2)
Intellectual Property Law as a Subject of the Exam
European Precedents on Copyrightablity of Perfumes
Inventive Step of an Invention and Protection and Use of the Patented Invention
Protection of Cultural Diversity and Protection of Copyright
Trip to Seoul
Soundless music! Is it a copyrightable work of music?
Allocation of enforcement resources in enforcing rights of Intellectual Property Right
Comparative Law Research and Management of the Database Project
Should IPR Earnings be Considered as Property to be Distributed at Divorce?
Things at Law School in America
Does Knowledge of Copyright Law Make Us Hesitated to Use Copyrighted Works?
Copyright Protection in the Internet Age
Foreign Pressure and "Harmonious, but Not Adulatory"
Rapidly Changing Intellectual Property Laws of Korea
Invitation to the Study of Design Patent Law
55 Years since "The Kiss at City Hall"
Peter Pan Act
Fairness, Transparency, and Openness of a Council
A Research Method of Onsite Hearing
Applicable law of international IPR in China
Taxation on royalty in Japan-and US
A Judge Makes No Excuses
Right or wrong: ban to import of music CDs
A Recommendation to Microsoft ; IP and Antimonopoly Act
Copyright Protection in the Internet Age - Legislation for Further Protection and Response to Increasing Demand from Users and Consumer Groups
RA Mari Nakayama
As the digital age arrives, every country is trying to prepare appropriate legislation for the age, responding the demand for further expansion of copyright protection for new technology. On November 1, 2003, France published the draft legislation on author's rights and neighboring rights in the digital age by the minister of culture and communication. The draft was examined at the committee of constitutional law, legislation and general administration of the National Assembly and adopted at that committee on June 1, 2005. To harmonize regional laws with the WIPO Copyright Treaty, the EU has adopted Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. The EU member states are now implementing their legislation in accordance with this directive. Despite its effort to implement the copyright directive, France was delayed in enacting its national law. The European Commission pointed out this delay, which made French government move forward with the plan strongly. The draft law includes relief for the circumvention of technical protection measures or modification of copyright management information, and also the exception for the copyright in case of a certain copying of contents for the use in the Internet.
However, there has been a discussion in France over the provision that regards the act of avoiding technical protection measures to protect copyrights as an infringement. Supporters of free software and Internet-user groups strongly oppose the rule, insisting that protecting the technical protection measures conflicts with the right of the reproduction for private use. In addition, on March 10, 2005, the Montpellier Court of Appeals decided that the system for DVD copy protect prevented consumers who bought the DVD legally from making copies for personal use. It concluded the use of the system of copy protection should be prohibited. On April 22, 2005, with the similar reason, the Paris Court of Appeals also prohibited the use of the copy protection system and ordered the company to pay a compensation for damages because it did not provide fully to their consumer about the information of the equipped copy protection system, referring to Article 122-3 and 211-3 of the Code of Intellectual Property. Responding these oppositions, the bill prescribed the provision to provide a minimum right of private use for users when the copyright is legally acquired.
Until recently, the rule about the circumvention of technical protection measures has remained controversial, criticized as an excessive protection or an obstacle to fair use of consumers. Today, the number of copyright infringements in the Internet has been growing as new technology has been developed. For example, a user can copy music or movie contents illegally by using the Peer-to-Peer software. Right holders and related industries are concerned about the spread of their economic loss. However, it is important to consider not only the benefits of right holders and industries, but also the benefits of consumers and the public interests. It is essential to maintain the balance of these benefits. It is strongly urged to establish a well-balanced copyright system that promotes creative activities, considering funding for artistic and cultural creation, use of information and distribution of information at the same time and enables the Internet industries to evolve in the future.
Copy right Research Center for the Legal System of Intellectual Property All rights reserved.
b@
Sitemap
@b@
Contact
b@
Japanese
@b