Activities
Holi Colour
Ž©”½Ž§kå«çäÝlŒá‰áá
One Friday in a Patent Attorney's Life
Things at Law School in America (3)
Harry Potter and the DDS Hallows
If You Look For a Wide Range of Human Resources
Software Copyright Registration System in China
Shane! Come Back! The case of "Shane"-
An "Intellectual Property-based Nation" and International Harmonization of Intellectual Property
If you listen
Industrial Property Digital Library
Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and Intellectual Property Right
Flying over Siberia
FAIR use of works of art
A New Strategic Move for IPR Protection in China
Could private companies be the savior of technical innovation in China?
A Sequel to the Used Game Lawsuit
Convergence of Telecommunication and Broadcasting
Things at Law School in America (2)
Intellectual Property Law as a Subject of the Exam
European Precedents on Copyrightablity of Perfumes
Inventive Step of an Invention and Protection and Use of the Patented Invention
Protection of Cultural Diversity and Protection of Copyright
Trip to Seoul
Soundless music! Is it a copyrightable work of music?
Allocation of enforcement resources in enforcing rights of Intellectual Property Right
Comparative Law Research and Management of the Database Project
Should IPR Earnings be Considered as Property to be Distributed at Divorce?
Things at Law School in America
Does Knowledge of Copyright Law Make Us Hesitated to Use Copyrighted Works?
Copyright Protection in the Internet Age
Foreign Pressure and "Harmonious, but Not Adulatory"
Rapidly Changing Intellectual Property Laws of Korea
Invitation to the Study of Design Patent Law
55 Years since "The Kiss at City Hall"
Peter Pan Act
Fairness, Transparency, and Openness of a Council
A Research Method of Onsite Hearing
Applicable law of international IPR in China
Taxation on royalty in Japan-and US
A Judge Makes No Excuses
Right or wrong: ban to import of music CDs
A Recommendation to Microsoft ; IP and Antimonopoly Act
Rapidly Changing Intellectual Property Laws of Korea
RA Lea Chang
Although Intellectual Property Law of Korea is not well known in Japan, exchanges between Japan and Korea in the IP field seem to grow rapidly such as cross-license agreements between Japanese companies and Korean companies. I would like to introduce IP Laws of Korea briefly, which have been revised one after another recently in the Republic of Korea.
First, "the Design Protection Law (former Design Law)" and "the Revised Korean Trademark Law" were announced on December 31, 2004 and became effective on July 1, 2005.
The revision of "the Design Protection Law" intended to improve the system of design protection innovatively in the digital age. Image designs had already become subject to protection by the Revised Design Examination Guideline from July 1, 2003. In addition to that, font or typeface design become subject to protection by this recent revision. That means the design law that had only protected product design traditionally has come to include a part of visual designs in its protection. It can be regarded as a remarkable improvement.
Furthermore, under the previous trademark law, the trademarks consisting solely of geographical name could not be registered. However, under the Revised Trademark Law, the marks consisting solely of a well-known geographical name may now be registered if the mark has acquired distinctiveness as the well-known regional products and the application is filed by the regional producer organization as "regional group trademark". Through promoting the consumption of distinctive regional specialties, it is expected to facilitate the development of local economies which have been suffering from agricultural market opening. Also, in Japan, the system of regional group trademark was introduced by "the law amending a part of the trademark law"iannounced on June 15, 2005, effective on April 1, 2006j.
On the other hand, "the Revision of a Part of the Patent Law" and "The Revision of the Utility Model Law" announced on April 29, 2005 include revisions to change the current system vastly.
Especially, the utility model system that currently has no examination procedure will turn into the system with the examination procedure by this revision. This amendment will eliminate the double application system of both patent and utility model and reestablish the correction system, instead. In addition, this revision announced many changes throughout Korean Patent system including the expansion of the scope of shared implementation from domestic to international. Related industries in Japan should also pay attention to these changes and that is why I bring this topic for this column.
Copy right Research Center for the Legal System of Intellectual Property All rights reserved.
b@
Sitemap
@b@
Contact
b@
Japanese
@b